If you're interested in the rift between Continental and Analytic philosophy, do check out Professor Vallicella's recent post on the topic. He writes as a non-Analyitic.
Link: Maverick Philosopher The Trouble with Continental Philosophy #1.
Define your terms. Make an assertion and defend it. Tell us what your thesis is. Say something definite. Try to be clear. Philosophy is hard enough even when one is clear. Avoid name dropping, that mark of the pseudo-intellectual. Go easy on the rhetorical questions. If you ever find something definite to say, employ the indicative mood.
Comments